Confucius and Plato

Confucius and Plato Editor Ken Wolf, at the beginning of the essay Confucius and Plato A a few(prenominal) Really Good People, poses the question What is the outperform way to create a brawny golf-club? (Wolf 25) It was surprising to a amateur student of philosophy how similar the inclinations of the ancient Chinese sage Confucius and famous Greek philosopher Plato were. Although, Confucius and Plato some(prenominal) made major contri butions to the victimisation of society, they showed both similarities and dissentences in these three subjects command class, education, and faith in cosmos.Confucius and Plato both believed rightfulness and intelligence were key components to creating a material society. Confucius thought anyone who has been enlightened had the capability to produce into a ruler. Whereas Plato assumed anyone could be educated, but only a few, those in the persuasion class had the ability to reason and on that pointfore were qualified to rule. In addi tion, Plato gave credence to the idea of being born into the ruling class, that the graphic symbol to reason was an inherited quality. Confucius and Plato were both knockout believers that order was a nonher main portion in a strong society.Although they both had laws to maintain the order, Plato had less faith in people in general to get along in a civilized manner. twain Confucius and Plato were in favor of education and were teachers themselves. Confuciuss followers were the ones who wrote the Analects, which talked about how civilization depends on humanity and propriety. Plato actually wrote The body politic which talked about his ideal philosopher-king. Plato established the Academy, which taught principles of morals and government, for 900 years. Confucius attempted to teach the ruler to ferment a better person, but failed.The concepts locate forth by Confucius and Plato begin to differ to a greater extent(prenominal) than when faith in humanity comes into play. Co nfucius and Plato both wanted to think there was good in everyone, but Confucius believed more in a society in which human relationshipsespecially those within the familywere more in-chief(postnominal) than laws. (Wolf 27) Plato concluded that the people take to be bidled for there to be order. That control was maintained through the law. They both seek out peace and harmony, although Confucius focused more on the behavior of individuals and Plato was interested in universal truth even though it probably would not be accepted,.Plato felt that if a person tried to confer enlightenment to the masses they would probably evaluate to kill to him for telling such tall tales, disrupting their lives and challenging their accustomed beliefs. (Wolf 31) Even today, near people would agree with Confucius and Plato about the magnificence of educating people in the development of a strong society. The idea of relationships as the institution of society may be summed up in Do unto oth ers as you would experience them do unto you. This Golden Rule seems to be as important to Western society as it was to Chinese society. However, the idea of a better quality of citizen that is better fit to lead society smacks of elitism and would definitely not be accepted in innovational democracies. However, that does not mean that the elite educated class from Harvard and Yale has not been overrepresented in American leadership. So perhaps we have a ruling elite, but not as overt as Plato would like. A concluding thought from the essay would be a harmonious and orderly existence is important to all societies.